The study aims to clarify the concept of throwing the embers in Hajj, and to clarify the opinions of jurists at the time of throwing the ember of the Great Aqaba beginning and ending, and the time of throwing the embers of the three days of al-Tashreeq starting and ending, and to indicate the aspects of facilitation and lifting the embarrassment of the taxpayer in times of throwing. The study followed the inductive, analytical, comparative, and descriptive approach, by tracking the jurisprudential issues of the Islamic jurisprudence schools of throwing the embers from the books of jurisprudence with a picture of the issue and then analyzing and discussing the evidence and comparing the opinions of jurists in it and weighting. The study concluded that the rule of throwing varies according to the case of the shooter, so the people of excuses and women progress in throwing the embers on others to lift the distress and embarrassment from them and reduce the crowding between them, so the time is narrowed on the pilgrims causing them harm, the accidents increase year after year at the time of throwing the embers; Disappearing.